Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-03-13-Speech-2-094"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-03-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010313.11.2-094"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-03-13-Speech-2-0952
lpv:speaker	lp:Anna Terrón i Cusí2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Temporary committee on the Echelon interception system (2000-07-06--2001-09-05)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Partit dels Socialistes de Catalunya (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, we are about to conduct a strange vote, as we did last month, on this strange new method of a legislative initiative by Member States. The amended initiative has been rejected. We are now called upon to vote, firstly on an amendment tabled by our group requesting that the Council be informed of the rejection of this initiative and that the Commission be asked to prepare a new proposal within the framework of its right to take the initiative. We shall then have to vote on the draft legislative resolution and a favourable vote is needed to inform the Council that we have rejected its initiative. It is complicated, but it is the same as the situation which arose at the previous plenary sitting and was explained by Mr Watson. That is to say, the next amendment does not fall. Rather, we still have to vote in favour of rejection for the sake of consistency."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph