Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-03-12-Speech-1-036"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Agenda2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010312.5.1-036"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-03-12-Speech-1-0372
lpv:speaker	lp:Olivier Dupuis2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-01-17--2002-01-14)3 member; PETI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees for relations with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; TGI (1999-07-20--2001-10-02)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I have been asking to speak for 15 minutes. You did not see me – you do not look in this direction very often. I have nothing to say with regard to the content. I think that there are many good reasons to hold a debate. As regards the form, I do not agree with Mr Poettering – our vote would not contravene the Rules of Procedure. We do not take a decision by majority that goes against our own Rules of Procedure. There was, however, a perfectly acceptable solution based on consensus, without the need for a vote. If everyone had been in favour, this item could possibly have been included in the agenda. Having said that, we are definitely not voting in contravention of the Rules of Procedure and I hope that everyone is clear on this."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph