Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-02-15-Speech-4-073"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010215.4.4-073"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-02-15-Speech-4-0742
lpv:speaker	lp:Philip Bushill-matthews2
lpv:spoken text	". – UK Conservatives are broadly happy with the original Lambert Report, which in its initial form usefully cleaned up some technical matters. Specifically however, we have voted against Amendments Nos 8 onwards. These amendments would significantly have extended the material scope of the Regulation: this should not be the role of miscellaneous amendments. It should be specifically noted that supplementary pensions are NOT State-provided social security payments, and cannot therefore come within the scope of Regulation 1408/71. Similarly, one amendment attempts to extend the scope of the regulation to taxation: this is simply not acceptable. UK Conservative MEPs will continue to resist any amendments to any report at any time which attempt to make similar encroachments into Member State competences."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Conservative and Unionist Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Bushill-Matthews (PPE-DE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph