Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-02-14-Speech-3-156"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-02-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010214.4.3-156"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-02-14-Speech-3-1572
lpv:speaker	lp:Gunilla Carlsson2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2002-03-07)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Moderata samlingspartiet (1999-07-20--2002-09-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-05-18--2002-01-14)3 substitute; EMPL (2000-05-17--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, last time this came before us, i.e. in 1998, Parliament rejected the common position. At that time there was widespread support in the House for the Commission being forced to take this way of reducing regulation in Europe seriously. We in the PPE-DE Group still take this line. I am surprised that Parliament is not now taking the same stand with regard to this very complicated, highly technical and over-detailed proposal. I do not believe it is fair to the voters for Parliament to devote itself to adopting a position on whether the gangway slope should be 12% or 12.5%. This is why I believe it was important to keep to the approach decided by Parliament in 1998. I am concerned that people change tack so quickly in the second reading. This is something which I believe the Commission really must take on board so that we can achieve a better method of creating regulations in Europe."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph