Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-01-18-Speech-4-119"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-01-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010118.4.4-119"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-01-18-Speech-4-1202
lpv:speaker	lp:Martin Schulz2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-10-27--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Cyprus Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; PES (2000-10-04--2002-03-06)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, Mr Posselt's last statement, his threat to talk for 20 minutes non-stop about the Deprez report, really is an argument for deferring the report at this stage. However, the basic problem here is something quite different. Mr Posselt has in fact said everything that needs to be said. What we are witnessing here – and we have already debated this once this afternoon, as we also did on Monday and Tuesday – is, and I shall make no bones about it, an attempt to systematically undermine Strasbourg as the seat of Parliament. Tactics like this are capable of achieving just that. Mr Posselt, even if it would make a valuable contribution if you were to speak for 20 minutes – and I too could also speak for 20 minutes, as no one else is left from my group either – in reality it would mean that the work Mr Deprez has so carefully done would not be debated in the way it deserves here. To that extent I can understand Mr Deprez's desire that his report, which is based on the approach developed in the committee and which should be reflected here in this Chamber, should be given a reasonable hearing in the plenary. So I really am in favour of deferring a report as important as this one, and for my part I would recommend acceding to Mr Deprez's request."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph