Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-01-18-Speech-4-099"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-01-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010118.4.4-099"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-01-18-Speech-4-1002
lpv:speaker	lp:Roseline Vachetta2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Ligue Communiste Révolutionnaire (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". I share the report’s preliminary approach, which stresses the need to take the external costs of charging into greater consideration. Obviously, infrastructure needs to be meticulously maintained and modernised. But what funding must be sought? The report stresses that nothing must hinder the development of the market in Member States, i.e. that business profits must not be made use of. The social dumping practised by the road industry or the scandal involving motorway concessions, for example, are not challenged in any way. Not wishing to increase taxation also entails preventing state intervention so as not to obstruct the sacrosanct rule of competition. On the contrary, the rapporteur advocates pursuing “the aim of phasing out distortions of competition between Member States”. Nowhere does the report make any reference to a state response to social needs, yet, on the other hand, the only response to the “all market” solution is to appeal to private companies, for both the construction and the management of infrastructure. As a result, the only parties to pay that are clearly identified in the text are road users, and that is why I shall not be voting in favour of this report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph