Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-01-17-Speech-3-153"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-01-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010117.4.3-153"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-01-17-Speech-3-1542
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Ducarme2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; ELDR (1999-09-13--2003-06-04)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Quaestors (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 quaestor; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees for relations with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Parti réformateur libéral/Front démocratique des francophones (1999-07-20--2003-06-04)3 quaestor; European Parliament (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". The explanatory statement sets out our justified concerns regarding this important issue, which affects the health of soldiers involved in operations in difficult areas. The local populations involved naturally have a vested interest in this, especially in relation to the necessary criteria for the social, economic and environmental reconstruction of the affected areas. In its entirety, therefore, the resolution is fair and I fully support it. However, as it stands, paragraph 6 goes too far, as it stands, in calling upon NATO member states to propose a moratorium, as the precautionary principle is included in the draft which urges NATO to consider other types of weapons until the results of the enquiry on depleted uranium are published. Since I am unable to support paragraph 6, I have therefore decided to abstain from voting on the whole text."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph