Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-01-17-Speech-3-120"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010117.4.3-120"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
For the most part, this report confines itself to general considerations without putting forward any practical decisions. Even when it does put forward a positive measure such as “proposals to extend access by dependent family members of frontier workers, retired frontier workers and dependent members of their families to health care provisions and benefits”, the Council is asked only “with all possible expedition to adopt a position”. While we support this request, we abstained from the vote on the report.
All the workers of the European Union ought to benefit from the same social protection, with each of the component areas (social security, retirement pensions, family benefits) standardised according to the practices of the country where they are most favourable to workers.
In the meantime, in order to improve the situation of frontier workers, they and their families should be able to choose, in each of these areas, between their country of residence and their country of employment, according to the situation most favourable to them."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples