Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-01-16-Speech-2-245"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20010116.11.2-245"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Question No 36 by Marie Anne Isler Béguin (): The Commission has just adopted a Green Paper on the security of energy supply. This document gives fresh encouragement to the nuclear industry, while at the same time the Commission’s estimates suggest a progressive reduction of the proportion of energy consumption supplied by nuclear power, down from the current 15% to 6% by 2030. Civil society is rejecting the promotion of nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuels. Is the Commission considering increasing the proportion of energy consumption supplied by nuclear power? If so, up to what level? How does it think it will be able to finance the development of renewable energy? How does it plan to use nuclear industry profits as an additional source of funding for renewable energy? Does it not consider it advisable, and indeed necessary, to redirect the financial resources now allocated to the promotion of nuclear research, including research into nuclear fusion, into the promotion of renewable energy?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Subject: Supply of energy and nuclear energy"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph