Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-01-16-Speech-2-207"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-01-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010116.11.2-207"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-01-16-Speech-2-2082
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 29 by Bart Staes () According to Commissioner Franz Fischler, the European ban on meat-and-bone meal will cost approximately EUR 4.5 billion. There is still great uncertainty surrounding compensation for the losses incurred. This means that the financial measures due to expire may create distortions of competition between the 15 EU Member States. Does the Commission support a coordinated European approach to the financial repercussions of the BSE crisis, given that the financial measures taken by the national and regional authorities that are now due to expire are leading to the distortion of competition between the 15 EU Member States? If not, why is the Commission against a coordinated approach?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Part II"1 "President. –"1 "Subject: Coordinated approach to the financial repercussions of the BSE crisis"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph