Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-12-13-Speech-3-104"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20001213.4.3-104"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
Unfortunately, although the Commission accepted many of the European Parliament's amendments, the Council did not.
Parliament needs to reinstate and re-table most of the amendments on the size of the warning, the list of ingredients and the protection of consumers, especially the young.
Of course, the European Parliament must avoid the extremes contained in certain amendments, which are not convincing, do not have a qualified majority and undermine the efficacy of its intervention as a whole. Of course, if we want to be consistent in our approach, we should put similar warnings on products which are equally harmful to consumers, such as animal fats.
Finally, basic integrity requires that we immediately start putting warnings on cigarettes exported from the European Union – in the language of the importing country."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples