Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-12-12-Speech-2-231"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-12-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20001212.9.2-231"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-12-12-Speech-2-2322
lpv:speaker	lp:Moscovici2
lpv:translated text	". Let me give you the Council’s interpretation of your question, and its answer. Regarding the specific cases you mentioned, mutual recognition will not lead to validation of a judgement which flouts essential rights such as the right to legal representation of one’s own choice or the right to the free assistance of an interpreter. On the one hand, these are rights which all the States have endorsed and which constitute the shared foundation of our criminal justice systems, and, on the other hand, mutual recognition is a process which is by no means automatic and which depends on the nature of the judgement in question. So, as the Council stated in its previous answer, the programme for mutual recognition can only bring improvements in terms of fundamental rights."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph