Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-11-30-Speech-4-124"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-11-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20001130.2.4-124"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-11-30-Speech-4-1252
lpv:speaker	lp:Lennart Sacrédeus2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Kristdemokraterna (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees and delegations for relations with Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova (1999-10-07--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". I have voted against the report. From among several points of which I am critical in the report I wish to mention the following examples: Paragraph 49: “Calls at all events for any Member State not wishing to take part in a task to be required, by reason of the mutual solidarity linking the Member States, to make a financial contribution to be divided between the participating States”. Paragraph 50: “Considers that Petersberg tasks should in the long term be funded from the general budget of the European Communities, which would require a revision of Article 28 of the TEU and of the Financial Perspective”. I consider that these two points are so far-reaching that it is difficult to maintain the right of alliance-free States such as Sweden to independent decision making within defence policy and the right to non-involvement in armed conflict. The wording in the report is thus too far-reaching and consequently reason enough to vote against the report as a whole."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph