Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-11-14-Speech-2-041"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-11-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Charter of Fundamental Rights2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20001114.2.2-041"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-11-14-Speech-2-0422
lpv:speaker	lp:Per Gahrton2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Miljöpartiet (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 chair; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I have long been among the sceptics. Parts of the Charter are to be welcomed, but others are a source of misgivings on the grounds of principle. What, for me, was the deciding factor was an appeal from Europe’s fastest growing progressive democratic movement, the French which characterises the Charter as an or tool of social regression. notes that the Charter involves a step backwards in relation to the Member States’, the UN’s, the Council of Europe’s and the ILO’s rules already in force. also notes that it ignores trade union rights and that, in actual fact, it is about establishing the free movement of capital. When Europe’s fastest growing progressive democratic movement, which has its roots in France, home to the first democratic revolution, and which cannot be suspected of anything resembling Scandinavian-style Euroscepticism, is so adamant about rejecting the draft Charter, it is impossible for me to vote in favour of it."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Attaque"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph