Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-10-03-Speech-2-030"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-10-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Preparation for the informal European Council in Biarritz of 13/14 October/Charter of Fundamental Rights2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20001003.2.2-030"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-10-03-Speech-2-0312
lpv:speaker	lp:Georges Berthu2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Rassemblement pour la France (1999-07-20--2000-11-22)3 member; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; ECON (1999-07-21--2001-01-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with Canada (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; UEN (2000-09-21--2001-01-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, in the referendum on the euro last week the Danes said no to the Europe of integration, no to the Europe of the super-state, and yes to a Europe of diversities, yes to a Europe that respects national democracies. The Biarritz Council and, three months hence, the Nice Council, which are to discuss the European institutions, must draw a significant conclusion from this. The response to enlargement is not increased supra-nationality, or an increase in powers, seated in Brussels, that are binding on all the Member States of the Union or even just on certain states that have joined together to form a hard core. The second lesson is one for the people of France, and, without doubt, one for other nations too. My compatriots voted for the single currency in 1992 because they had been told that this could work without a super-state. Well, that is not true. This is now quite evident with the slump in the euro. In 1992, the French came to a decision on the basis of spurious information. They must now, in the light of experience, come to another decision, but this time on the basis of frank and comprehensive criteria."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph