Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-09-20-Speech-3-065"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-09-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Eurodac2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000920.6.3-065"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-09-20-Speech-3-0662
lpv:speaker	lp:Anna Terrón i Cusí2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Temporary committee on the Echelon interception system (2000-07-06--2001-09-05)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Partit dels Socialistes de Catalunya (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, as the rapporteur, Mr Pirker, has said, this Parliament has already expressed its opinion more than once on the proposed Eurodac Agreement. Last time it expressed its opinion on the proposal as a whole and I believe that the position Parliament adopted was very close to what the Socialist Group wanted. I wish to defend Parliament’s position, which this House voted for a few months ago in relation to the Eurodac Agreement. I therefore believe that we are now being consulted on an amendment which the Council is introducing in this communication, and that it affects the allocation of competences for this action by the Council. The Treaty established that the Commission must have responsibility for implementation – for Eurodac also, we believe – and also established that Parliament can supervise what the Commission does. This still does not seem sufficient to us, and we hope that, at least in the legislative and supervisory field, we can have further competences. For this reason, my Group is tomorrow going to abstain in the vote on all the amendments which do not relate to this change to the Council’s communication. We are going to abstain on those amendments which we feel have already been approved by Parliament and which are already included in this Parliament’s previous report. We are going to abstain for reasons which I imagine are very different from Mr Pirker’s reasons for voting against it, but we are going to abstain in order to maintain the position which Parliament has already expressed. However, on behalf of my group, I would like to express my support for the amendments proposed by Mr Pirker, for the reasons which I have already expressed, because I believe that the previous proposal was better and because I believe that the Commission must take this project forward. I hope that it does so taking account of Parliament’s decision and it is important that tomorrow’s vote shows Parliament’s strong support for the previous proposal. Mr President, we are developing a third pillar on the basis of policies which have been intergovernmental and which must become Community policies. I believe it is very important for Parliament to support these first actions we are taking and also to support the Commission so that it can play the role accorded it by the Treaty."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph