Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-09-06-Speech-3-135"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000906.5.3-135"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"The MEPs of the Left regret that, because of the Danish reservation, the Danish Government has not been able to influence the directive and is the only government not to have the right of veto, just as we regret the fact that, unlike other countries, Denmark will not make more demands of immigrants to Denmark who wish to reunite their families and require them to be self-supporting and to have somewhere to live. The draft Directive’s proposal concerning the right to family reunification after one year would not be any problem if, in common with other countries, Denmark were to make such demands, as expressly laid down in the draft directive. In that case, it would not be the local authorities’ task to support and find homes for the people concerned, as it is at present. As matters stand, the one-year rule cannot, however, be practised in Denmark without significant problems. We therefore decline to vote on the report, regretfully because we should like to see a common policy, especially in the field of asylum."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples