Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-09-05-Speech-2-204"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-09-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000905.11.2-204"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-09-05-Speech-2-2052
lpv:speaker	lp:Moscovici2
lpv:translated text	". I can only repeat my previous answer, namely that the maintenance of public order and any application of penal sanctions are a matter, respectively, for the jurisdiction of the police forces and the legal authorities of the Member State concerned. Let me quote the relevant part of the Regulation, which stipulates that, “Where the Commission considers that an obstacle is occurring in a Member State, it shall notify the Member State concerned of the reasons that have led the Commission to such a conclusion and shall request the Member State to take all necessary and proportionate measures to remove the said obstacle.” I therefore feel – and I am not saying that in order to duck the question, as we say – that the honourable Member would do better to address the question to the Commission, which does have the necessary means to provide a reliable and up-to-date response."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph