Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-09-04-Speech-1-064"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-09-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Agenda2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000904.5.1-064"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-09-04-Speech-1-0652
lpv:speaker	lp:Paul A.A.J.G. Lannoye2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Ecolo (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Conference of Presidents (1999-07-20--2002-01-07)3 chair; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2002-01-07)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (1999-09-14--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Development and Cooperation (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, my group takes the opposite view, to the effect that it is important to vote upon a resolution. In the first place, it is not the first time that Parliament has given an opinion on the subject of human cloning. On several occasions since the advent of Dolly we have voted on a number of resolutions. If anyone adopted a unilateral stance on these occasions, it was the British Government which, without any prior consultation whatsoever, adopted a position in favour of therapeutic cloning. We therefore consider that a reaction from the European Parliament which does not close the door on the debate is a useful move. When I say we must not close the door, clearly the suggestion of a temporary committee must not be rejected out of hand. I am not saying that I am for or against that, but I do think that it would be a good idea for Parliament to deliver its opinion by some means other than an inconclusive debate."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph