Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-06-Speech-4-330"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-07-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000706.13.4-330"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-07-06-Speech-4-3312
lpv:speaker	lp:Bordes, Cauquil and Laguiller (GUE/NGL )2
lpv:translated text	". We abstained from the vote on this proposal even though we are firmly convinced that a policy of exchange and cooperation between different countries in the field of education would contribute to improving the quality of education by promoting the intermixing of cultures and exchanges between the peoples living in Europe. Such a policy would only be a factor in progress, however, if it were based on an education policy within the various states which aims to earmark greater resources for public education accessible to all. At no point in the texts, though, is this priority stated, but more especially, in none of the countries of the European Union is it applied. We are concerned that a number of phrases are indicative of a restrictive and utilitarian concept of a form of cooperation whose objectives would be dictated by the constraints of the market and initiatives by firms or private bodies looking for a workforce they could train and qualify according to their requirements. Introducing the laws of the market into education, however, means keeping the best quality for a minority and allowing the quality for the majority to deteriorate. We therefore voted in favour of the amendments warning against allowing the market to play too great a part in education."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph