Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-06-Speech-4-283"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000706.12.4-283"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"(
) Mr President, I will tell you immediately that the ELDR group refused to sign the joint resolution for a very simple reason: we find it a little over-emotional, while not forceful enough, and does not offer the possibility of a more political and more balanced choice in the name of Parliament.
It is because this resolution is too weak that we will not vote for it. We consider that the problem associated with the resignation of Mr Pelinka is important enough not to be tackled by a resolution that is emotional but does not actually say anything and is extremely watered-down.
Allow me to address a comment to the GUE Group and the PSE Group. I do not understand their agreement on the text in its current form, in relation to the initial text that they themselves introduced. Consequently, we within the liberal group would like, and this is the wish of Mr Watson, his committee to be able to effectively take control of the matter and we would like to have very clear information on whether the Austrian Government has infringed Article 10 of the Treaty, that is, whether or not it has fulfilled its obligations with regard to the Monitoring Centre.
If it has not fulfilled its obligations, it is up to Parliament to take the appropriate action with regard to the Commission and the Council. The main thing is to make it clear and today we are not clear."@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"FR"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples