Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-06-Speech-4-187"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-07-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Topical and urgent debate2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000706.7.4-187"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-07-06-Speech-4-1882
lpv:speaker	lp:Johannes Blokland2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij - Gereformeerd Politiek Verbond - Reformatorisch Politieke Federatie (1999-07-20--2002-03-17)3 co-chair; EDD (1999-07-20--2001-01-29)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; ECON (2000-02-02--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovak Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, you are interpreting the text in a specific way, but I read the text and it does not make any mention of exemptions for urgent debates. Every item that is put on Monday’s agenda by the House can be taken off the agenda again in the course of the week, should it transpire that, on reflection, fresh arguments have come to light. New arguments have emerged in this instance. We now know that the Dutch justice system is launching an inquiry. It seems clear to me, therefore, that when we decided to discuss this matter on Monday, we did not have this piece of information at our disposal. We now have new information, which we need to take into account. I therefore believe that your interpretation of the Rules of Procedure is not according to the letter of the Rules of Procedure."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph