Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-05-Speech-3-263"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Proposal for a regulation on a Community patent2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000705.8.3-263"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-07-05-Speech-3-2642
lpv:speaker	lp:Paul Rübig2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Slovak Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Österreichische Volkspartei (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I would like to follow up Mrs Kauppi’s question, in relation to the strategy on the level of invention. A high level of invention has the advantage that it is easy to defend in court, because revocation proceedings are of course a huge problem. A low level of invention has the advantage that many companies and inventors can submit their inventions and obtain a patent very quickly. That is why I believe that the strategic level Europe is to adopt is a vital issue, because the Japanese, for instance, have now adopted the principle of a low level of invention and accordingly have a flood of applications. Europe and the European Patent Office in fact have a very high level of inventiveness. I believe that this is enormously significant as an instrument of economic policy."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph