Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-05-Speech-3-256"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Proposal for a regulation on a Community patent2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000705.8.3-256"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-07-05-Speech-3-2572
lpv:speaker	lp:Piia-Noora Kauppi2
lpv:spoken text	"I am very happy to hear that the Commission has decided to limit the number of languages that can be used for the Community patent. At the moment translation costs are the biggest problem when we try to reduce the costs and speed up the process. I warmly welcome the proposal and hope that the IGC is ready to make the necessary changes to the Treaties. But I would like to ask a specific question concerning the process in EPO. I was under the impression that the process itself would remain more or less the same in the new system. Why is it that at the moment the EPO uses the system of many experts instead of the system of one expert, which is in use in Japan and the United States? There the patent is granted when one expert has given their opinion. That is also a factor in making the process in Europe more costly and slower than that of our competitors."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Kauppi (PPE-DE )."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph