Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-07-03-Speech-1-029"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Agenda2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000703.5.1-029"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-07-03-Speech-1-0302
lpv:speaker	lp:Jannis Sakellariou2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AGRI (1999-07-22--2001-01-17)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, once again it is not the content of a motion for a resolution that is at issue here but our Rules of Procedure. In the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy we have been trying to ensure – and I appeal to all those colleagues who have been involved in this initiative – that important issues of this kind are not dealt with in the topical and urgent debate; instead we want to ensure that proper treatment is reserved for them in the form of a committee procedure, an oral question or a Council statement. Here the issue is Tibet. We know how important this is. In 1992 I personally produced a report on Tibet. A motion reflecting the report's conclusions was adopted almost unanimously by Parliament. On 15 April here in this House we unanimously adopted a resolution on Tibet, and now we are repeating what we said on 15 April, perhaps with one or two minor additions. I do not believe that Parliament's reputation is enhanced by our constantly debating the same subjects. That is why we are requesting that this item be withdrawn."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph