Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-06-14-Speech-3-254"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-06-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000614.10.3-254"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-06-14-Speech-3-2552
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexandros Alavanos2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3 member; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Synaspismos tis Aristeras kai tis Proodou (1999-07-20--2004-04-14)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I should like to thank the President-in-Office for his reply. Yesterday I tabled the same question to the European Commission. I received its reply today. However, there is some confusion in the matter which, as far as Greece is concerned, is an extremely important matter. I thank the President-in-Office, although I noticed that he contradicted himself in his reply. On the one hand he says that it is not a Community matter, it is a matter for the Member State. On the other hand, however, he raises the question of compliance with the law. The President-in-Office obviously has in mind the reply which the Commission gave on precisely this issue, which says that a reference to religion infringes Directive 46/95 on personal data. Does the President-in-Office agree with this reply, if that is what he has in mind? Or does he not have it in mind, which would demonstrate a huge lack of coordination between the Council and the Commission on a very important issue?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph