Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-06-14-Speech-3-017"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-06-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Approval of the Minutes of the previous sitting2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000614.1.3-017"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-06-14-Speech-3-0182
lpv:speaker	lp:Gerhard Schmid2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; BUDG (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with South-east Europe (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; PES (2000-03-08--2002-01-16)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-12-16--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I believe I have because, as far as the procedure is concerned, we have two options. First, we can vote separately on the question of setting up a temporary committee and the question of setting up a committee of inquiry. We can do that separately and at different times. But the Rules of Procedure do not require us to proceed in this way. The motion, therefore, is to vote on both questions jointly as a package and that is our second option. I cannot see that it will prejudice the idea of a committee of inquiry, which is what you want, if we merge the votes and the whole issue takes another three weeks. It makes no material difference; at some point the House will have to state its view. I repeat: it would be possible, but the President suggests that we proceed differently and I suggest likewise to you now."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President. –"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph