Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-06-13-Speech-2-057"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-06-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Request for the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Mr Brie2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000613.6.2-057"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-06-13-Speech-2-0602
lpv:speaker	lp:Herman Schmid2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Vänsterpartiet (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, it is possible that the rules concerning immunity which exist in many national parliaments, and also in our European Parliament, are in fact an historical remnant which is really not needed. As long as these rules exist, however, they must apply equally to everyone. In the case of Mr Brie’s crime, which we are now discussing, this clearly relates, in the first place, to political activity. It is a matter of a demonstration. What is more, his crime really only has to do with the administrative rules in the police regulation and of his not having sought and obtained prior permission in accordance with these. This is, of course, not enough to justify waiving immunity for, in that case, serious offences need to have been committed, for example assault or some other crime or an action which puts other people’s lives and security in danger. This case is concerned only with a purely administrative violation. I understand that the same view has been expressed by members of different parties in Germany. I therefore think that the matter is quite clear. On behalf of my group, I would therefore express support for the draft decisions tabled by the rapporteur."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph