Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-05-18-Speech-4-267"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000518.11.4-267"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, we are unable to support the submitted resolution. I was in favour of discussing the topic of hooliganism but this resolution can at best be described as agenda pollution. This Parliament should not be discussing safety during one particular Euro 2000 match under pressure from what I assume is a portion of British public opinion. It is also an insult to – in this case – the Belgian organisers of this game and the international authorities involved. This is a great pity because extensive discussions can be held about the fight against hooliganism itself. In addition, we continue to learn important lessons, such as for example, how we should really guide the fans? How can we better educate club managers and organisers of games? Attention should also be given to the so-called ‘second opinion’ which is now being applied, by means of which a group outside the organisation analyses the measures taken and suggests improvements.
Mr President, hooligans have managed to spoil the fun of the real fans too often. It will be different at Euro 2000, as this will be a football party for everyone."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples