Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-05-18-Speech-4-116"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000518.4.4-116"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-05-18-Speech-4-1172
lpv:speaker	lp:Marianne Thyssen2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Christelijke Volkspartij (1999-07-20--2001-09-30)3 member; ECON (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I would like to congratulate my colleague, Mr Ferber, on his report, although I did not agree with everything and voted – against his recommendation – for Amendment No 2 and against Amendment No 8 of his draft resolution. I have done so with great conviction because I am of the view that we as the European Parliament do not send out a political signal or pre-empt a political decision by adopting the Secretary-General’s proposal (and filling 35 vacancies in the language sector) but accomplish this by doing the exact opposite. As long as the House rules on language use are not amended, the candidate countries and ourselves can assume that the language arrangement will stay as it is, that is to say: first of all, that each MEP can use his own language at official meetings. Secondly, that each MEP has documents in his language at his disposal. Thirdly, that we in this way are not only treating the Members equally but above all, the citizens we represent."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph