Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-04-12-Speech-3-234"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20000412.7.3-234"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Question No 10 by Eija-Riitta Anneli Korhola ():
The key to the development of the developing countries is their ability to participate in development work themselves both as definers of problems and as seekers for solutions. On the other hand, at EU level this approach is being poorly applied in relation to science and technology projects affecting developing countries. The EU’s framework programmes do not extend to the developing countries. This means that North African partners, for example, are not able to be involved in science and technology projects relating to the environment. In fact no-one is preventing them from carrying out the research, but there are no funding opportunities, and thus the developing countries have no access to consortia as partners entitled to apply for funding.
Why is this not the case, given that opportunities have been devised for even Russia, for example, to be involved? Has the matter been considered from the point of view of the extent to which, for example, desertification in North Africa or the problems of the Mediterranean affect the EU? Is the EU prepared to provide greater responsibility in the form of funding to local researchers, so that research activities can combine even after the funding bodies have left, and to ensure that projects can be carried out without the investment of local researchers?"@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"Subject: Participation of research partners from the developing countries in environmental research programmes funded by the EU"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples