Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-30-Speech-4-030"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-03-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:The “Echelon” system2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000330.2.4-030"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-03-30-Speech-4-0312
lpv:speaker	lp:Maria Berger2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; PES (2000-03-08--2002-01-16)3 member; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, because so many questions have unfortunately remained unanswered today, I should like to ask a number of further questions and request that the Council and the Commission answer these. Is it true – and this is a matter for the Commission and the Council – that representatives of the Commission and the Council have been working, under the chairmanship of the Americans, on Echelon-compatible European telecommunications standards, including interception options, and this within the framework of ILETS, a so-called institute? This then provided us with the notorious Infopol documents. How great is the damage which has already been caused to the European economy? Are there companies in addition to Thomson and the Airbus consortium which have sustained damage? What will the Council and the Commission do, and how will they deal with those Member States of the European Union who are spying on their partners in the Union in order – as, in fact, has been admitted – to protect their economic well-being? How will the Commission and the Council respond to the answer from the Americans, which was read out today and which clearly contradicts what, for example, ex-CIA director Mr Woolsey has stated?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph