Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-16-Speech-4-141"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-03-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000316.3.4-141"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-03-16-Speech-4-1422
lpv:speaker	lp:Bernd Posselt2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like to follow on from what Mrs Lulling has just said. I should like to say that Mr Haarder has made an exemplary effort to bring about a consensus. As a result, his report was far better than all the previous reports. However, I and a majority in my Group voted against the report because points 52 – 56 contain quite controversial social policy requirements which may well be supported by the left wing of this House but which have nothing to do with human rights. The German constitution offers marriage and the family special protection and that has nothing to do with the violation of human rights. On the contrary, it is a guarantee of human rights. Marriage and the family form the basis for human rights, as does the right to life. I therefore believe that these points should have been left out of the human rights report. If they had, the House would have voted unanimously in favour of this human rights report because, apart from that, Mr Haarder has presented an exemplary piece of work."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph