Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-15-Speech-3-243"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-03-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000315.7.3-243"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-03-15-Speech-3-2442
lpv:speaker	lp:Esko Seppänen2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Vasemmistoliitto (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Estonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, during the Finnish presidency, we were able to get through twenty questions in question time. Last time we covered twelve with Portugal as the country holding the presidency. It seems as if we will not get through any more than that today either. But my actual question concerns the fact that the President of the European Commission, Mr Prodi, has sent a letter to the European Parliament criticising the Parliamentary Ombudsman, Jacob Söderman, for having taken part in a public debate and wanting various documents to be widely accessible, as well as having presented his own point of view that there should be more public access to documents in the EU. I would ask the representative of the Council whether he thinks the President of the Commission’s action was right and justified, and whether the Council also wants to restrict the Ombudsman’s freedom of speech on this topic."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph