Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-14-Speech-2-092"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-03-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000314.7.2-092"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-03-14-Speech-2-0932
lpv:speaker	lp:Theodorus J.J. Bouwman2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-12-16--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3 substitute; EMPL (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; GroenLinks (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I just wanted to point out what repercussions a split vote would have. Normally, it is customary in parliamentary circles to vote on the most in-depth proposal first and then to move on to the less in-depth. Due to this split vote, we are now voting on the least in-depth first and are working our way up to the most in-depth. Since I am fairly new to this Parliament, I do not know how to deal with this, but I would at least recommend anyone who cares about the environment and who is in favour of the polluter pays principle, to vote for both split components."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph