Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-03-13-Speech-1-077"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-03-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental dimension in the development process2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000313.3.1-077"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-03-13-Speech-1-0782
lpv:speaker	lp:Karin Scheele2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (1999-09-14--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Development and Cooperation (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the regulation on the table gives the European Union an instrument and the legal – but also the political – responsibility to ensure that the environmental dimension is integrated into development policy. To do this, sufficient financial support is of course necessary. That is why I, like one previous speaker already, advocate voting in favour of the rapporteur's Amendment No 11. Since integrating the environmental dimension is a long-term commitment, I am in principle against limiting the duration of this regulation. However, the arguments that excessively lengthy negotiations with the Council are putting existing projects – projects which are already up and running – at risk have persuaded me otherwise. I also believe that Amendment No 9, which seeks to involve civil society in exchanging information and implementing this regulation, is of fundamental importance, because in my opinion the discussions about civil society and the discussions about good governance must not only be reflected on the political soapbox but also in active policy implementation. In the same way I support the rapporteur's proposal on split comitology, whereby decisions on the strategic guidelines would be decided under a management procedure and those on implementation under an advisory procedure."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph