Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-02-17-Speech-4-041"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-02-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Member States2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000217.3.4-041"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-02-17-Speech-4-0422
lpv:speaker	lp:Ole Krarup2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; PETI (1999-10-08--2001-09-09)3,3 substitute; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Malta Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3,3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EDD (1999-07-20--2001-12-10)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3,3 unknown; Folkebevægelsen mod EU (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with South-east Europe (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"In my Group, there are undoubtedly different views of Mr Di Pietro’s report. I agree that it is – as has been said – a good and competent piece of work, which has been carried out under difficult conditions. The Danish Members of the Group cannot vote in favour of the proposal but will, on the contrary, be supporting a number of amendments, especially those tabled by the Greens. There are two reasons why we are saying no. Firstly, these are immensely complicated and very sensitive legal questions which are at issue and, to my mind, the proposal entails some risks to legal certainty, which have not been fully realised. This is in itself sufficient reason for us to deny our support. The other main reason, however, is that, even though we are concerned here with a Convention (and therefore with international cooperation), there is no doubt about the trend expressed in the proposal. And the trend is towards creating, in the longer term, a common European area of jurisdiction, common EU criminal law and common EU administration of justice. We would warn against that trend. We have this AFSJ mantra – Area of Freedom, Security and Justice – the full enormity of which lies in its establishment of EU systems which will play havoc with existing legal traditions relating to these sensitive and important questions which are overwhelmingly national in character."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph