Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2000-02-15-Speech-2-239"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2000-02-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20000215.10.2-239"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2000-02-15-Speech-2-2402
lpv:speaker	lp:Professor Sir Neil MacCORMICK2
lpv:spoken text	"I am grateful for a clear answer though naturally a little disappointed by its content. We are left with Article 11(1) which says that the appropriations of the funds may not replace public or other equivalent structural expenditure by the Member States. Very well: that is to be the unchanging rule. Does section 11(1) conceivably authorise the following practice. When an autonomous region's or country's funding from European structural funds increases, the state makes a concomitant reduction in central funding to that region, so that the total funding package available matches a formula set nationally without regard to the quantum of structural funds granted by the Union. Is that really authorised?"@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Scottish National Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"MacCormick (Verts/ALE )."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph