Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-12-16-Speech-4-197"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-12-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Νatural disasters2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991216.9.4-197"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-12-16-Speech-4-1982
lpv:speaker	lp:Peter Liese2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, may I request, if the Members agree, that we vote on all the proposed amendments to the resolution on Nicaragua, given that they all go in the same direction. I should like to say two words about why this is not a joint resolution and why the PPE has tabled proposed amendments to its own resolution. The reason is that we held a meeting on Tuesday with a view to finding a joint resolution and the other groups, especially the Liberals and the Social Democrats, warned us that they would be unable to support certain clauses in the resolution. So we said, let us take the controversial points out and just leave the essentials in. We therefore only have things in it which are unanimously supported by Parliament. Commissioner Verheugen also clearly stated that Parliament should express a view on this matter. As the Liberals and Social Democrats were still unable to sign the joint resolution which we negotiated, we said we will table proposed amendments which water down our own resolution somewhat, in order to give Members the possibility in the end of voting in favour."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph