Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-12-15-Speech-3-317"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.19991215.10.3-317"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, I believe the Council has already answered the question about the case of the journalist, and I would like to point out that the Council altered its own position in this case regarding public access to documents so that in the end there was just one document, information on which was not to be given out. In that sense, obviously, the Council itself – how can I say this? – corrected its procedures to make for greater transparency, which has been spoken of here. Regarding the original question, I would say that the decisions of the Court and the documents associated with them are obviously rather a different matter from that of decisions of a body drafting legal provisions. In this sense also, the criteria for openness regarding whose varying opinions should be made known and whose should not – as those of the judges are not – are obviously different matters for consideration."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples