Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-12-15-Speech-3-311"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-12-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991215.10.3-311"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-12-15-Speech-3-3122
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Question No 12 by Piia-Noora Kauppi (): Recent events in the European Union have shown that EU decision making must be public. The EU institutions have made considerable efforts to create a climate of openness with regard to decision making. However, unlike the courts in many Member States, the European Court of Justice has a policy of only limited openness. No statistics are kept of the outcome of votes in connection with its decisions and judges do not express views at variance with Court judgments. Does the Council intend to take steps to ensure that after a reform of its activities the European Court of Justice complies with this principle of openness by introducing more transparent decision making? Does the Council intend to urge that the outcome of votes in connection with decisions should be published and that judges should be allowed to express views at variance with a given judgement?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President"1 "Subject: Practice of the European Court of Justice with regard to openness"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph