Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-12-13-Speech-1-130"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.19991213.6.1-130"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:translated text
". May I thank the rapporteur, Mr Niels Busk, and congratulate him on the excellent report he has presented on the Commission proposal with a view to integrating the NEAFC scheme of control into Community legislation. In the area of control, the NEAFC scheme provides a model, based on the terms of the agreement on straddling stocks and highly migratory fish, or New York Agreement. It is a model which concords broadly with the viewpoints defended by the Community in the context of this agreement. The measures on the conservation of fish stocks and the monitoring of fishing activities must be dealt with in agreements signed in the framework of regional fishing organisations, and these organisations must serve as a platform for international cooperation. The Community has contributed actively to the preparation of the NEAFC scheme of control. The measures laid down are totally compatible with our point of view and our priorities regarding the improvement of the monitoring of high seas fishing activities. In this context, it is of the utmost importance that the conditions of the NEAFC scheme of control should be integrated into Community legislation. The Community must strive to ensure the success of this scheme of control, which will then serve as a model for other regional organisations, and the support which Parliament has given this proposal shows that, in this field as in others, as you know, Mr President, we share the same point of view. The matter of financing and the distribution of financial burdens must be the subject of a debate in the wider context of the regional fishing organisations. In order to bring about a debate of this kind, Mr Fischler sent you a communication on Community participation in regional fishing organisations, and this was also sent to the Council. And Mr Fischler wishes to take part in the debate to be held on these points at the appropriate time, at some time next year. On the basis of the conclusions which will be drawn from this wide-ranging debate, the Commission will then present fresh proposals, on which Parliament will be invited to give its opinion. Mr Stevenson made a very pertinent comment, Mr President, and I have to say that the Commission acknowledges the criticism which has been levelled against it. The fact is, however, that his remarks were directed not at the Prodi Commission but at their predecessors, and I must point out, on behalf of Commissioner Fischler, that we shall be doing all we can to ensure that such criticism is not justified in future."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph