Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-19-Speech-5-034"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-11-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991119.2.5-034"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-11-19-Speech-5-0352
lpv:speaker	lp:Martin Schulz2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-07-22--2000-10-26)3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Cyprus Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2000-10-03)3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Briefly, I would like to have it put on record that our Group has rejected the Newton Dunn report on account of the fact we did not agree with the legal basis to this report. What we have here is a classic ruling on the establishment of a process in one of the various pillars of our Treaty principles. Mr Newton Dunn chose the first pillar whereas we were of the opinion that the procedure should be left in the third pillar. The reason for this is that in the third pillar the group of offenders who are guilty of counterfeiting travel documents is more wide-ranging than in the first pillar where Mr Newton Dunn had established it, where the focus is exclusively on the tracking of the counterfeiting of documents for illegal immigrants. That may be appropriate from the ideological viewpoint but is politically wrong because someone who, as a drugs dealer, counterfeits documents must also be criminally prosecuted. In this respect, we did not want to vote against Mr Newton Dunn’s practical proposals with regard to the combating of document counterfeiting which we support as far as we are concerned it is exclusively a matter of the legal basis. Thank you for your attention. I would also like to thank Messrs Poettering and Pirker for their attention."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph