Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-19-Speech-5-030"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-11-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991119.2.5-030"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-11-19-Speech-5-0312
lpv:speaker	lp:Erik Meijer2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Socialistische Partij (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovak Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I have voted against the Giannakou-Koutsikou report. It is a very lengthy document which represents all shades of opinion and contains a multitude of considerations and objectives. It gives enormous scope. It is opposed to trafficking and profiteers, rightly so. It endeavours to help people fight their addiction, again rightly so. But this means that it is spreading itself rather thinly and the thrust of the document is that with more funding and tougher prosecution, we can knock the problem on the head. Quite interestingly, Mr Schulz’s proposal to give urban and regional experiments more of a chance, has been rejected. I fear that this text will now be used incorrectly, namely to support those, in particular, who advocate more repression against drug users and think that they will solve the problem in this way. As such, the PPE viewpoint has, in principle, dominated after all and this was a reason for me not to go along with it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph