Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-18-Speech-4-178"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.19991118.7.4-178"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"I cannot vote in favour of the Dimitrakopoulos/Leinen report for reasons which include the following.
The report has a clear supranational character. I support cooperation between States, but not the supranational dimension which the rapporteurs advocate and which was clearly rejected in the latest EU election.
I also oppose the demands for common military defence, especially in sections 26 and 27 which require a “binding timetable” for a common defence and security policy which is to guarantee the EU’s external borders. Nor can I accept that the WEU should be integrated in such a way that the EU might in the future take measures with the help of credible military resources. No exception is to be made for Article 5 which prescribes a mutual responsibility for intervening militarily if another Member State is attacked. Sweden is militarily non-aligned, aiming at neutrality in times of war, and may in no circumstances take part in common military defence.
I consider that it should only be possible to revise the EU’s statute through a unanimous decision in the Council of Ministers.
Finally, I consider that Parliament ought to concentrate on the changes which must take place if we are to cope with decision making in an enlarged EU."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples