Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-11-18-Speech-4-102"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-11-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991118.7.4-102"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-11-18-Speech-4-1032
lpv:speaker	lp:Konrad K. Schwaiger2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (1999-09-14--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2000-02-09)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Hungary Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I believe we are dealing with three adjectives. Free and fair world trade is the basis for the WTO Negotiations – that was my original text. A proposal for an amendment was then agreed in the Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy, where “socially-balanced” was added. The opinions differ as to which adjectives should be added. I feel in any case that it should be "free and fair world trade”. Everyone agreed to that. The question of “is socially tolerable” or “socially acceptable” was disputed. We should therefore vote on the original text saying “free and fair world trade” and then vote separately on “socially-balanced”. Then we would have a result on the third point. I should in any case like to point out that "free and fair world trade” was the basis of all our work and an addition was appended here on which we should now vote."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph