Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/1999-10-27-Speech-3-023"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"1999-10-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Outcome of the European Council of 15/16 October in Tampere2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.19991027.1.3-023"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:1999-10-27-Speech-3-0242
lpv:speaker	lp:Ole Krarup2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; PETI (1999-10-08--2001-09-09)3 substitute; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Malta Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EDD (1999-07-20--2001-12-10)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Folkebevægelsen mod EU (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with South-east Europe (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"There are in fact legal problems with cross-national borders and which demand cooperation. These are predominantly technical problems which we might reasonably set the lawyers to solve. However, the ambitions which now dominate, both in the motion for a resolution concerning the Tampere Summit and in the communications from the Commission, go much, much further. They go much further because the hidden agenda is not merely to solve technical problems but to establish a number of supranational systems. There has been talk of “creating a union of security”. This is part of the European Union’s project and of the development of the Union, and it goes much further than is necessary. When the discussion turns to legal and home affairs, it is the family silver we are talking about. We are at the heart of a nation’s right to make its own decisions. We talk about a common policy on crime, refugees and immigration, but the question is: which policy is to be pursued? There are widely different interpretations of crime involving drugs, for example. There are many different legal traditions and, where legal policy is concerned, you can talk in terms of repressive and liberal approaches. You can do so too on the question of refugees and immigration. I would warn against establishing the supranational systems. Better to wait a bit and not be too impulsive."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph